Stage 3 of the review of the National Standard of Competency for Architects (NSCA) concluded at the end of July. This stage sought input from Stakeholders on an Issues Paper that described the background, issues and recommendations for change within the Standard. The majority of stakeholder feedback:
Supported the issues identified in the Paper as being appropriate to form the basis of further changes to the NSCA
Supported the recommendations for change to the NSCA identified in the Paper, based on the assumption that the changes would address the issues identified in the Issues Paper.
Some themes identified in the stakeholder feedback included:
Some stakeholders emphasised the need to ensure changes to social and ethical matters are appropriate and meaningful in how they are approached and measured (or tested) within the standard
Whilst design is essentially at the heart of the profession, some stakeholders were concerned about a diminished role for other professional responsibilities, including project management.
Some stakeholders indicated a desire to increase the recognition of the importance of technology to the profession, and incorporation of related language
Some stakeholders indicated a desire to see the Review influence changes to the content in accredited qualifications.
Stage 4 of the review is progressing well. This stage involves:
Drafting of detailed revisions to the Standard
Development of an implementation strategy for the revised Standard across AACA programs
The Expert Reference Group continues to guide the direction of the review work, whilst further expertise from outside of the AACA is engaged to inform the detailed re-drafting of the Standard. Stage 4 work continues based on the Expert Reference Group’s earlier agreement that the essential components of the current NSCA are sound but recognises the need to reframe the NSCA so that it:
reflects the knowledge, skills and competencies required of architects now and into the immediate future;
reframes architectural services away from the traditional linear framework of services described in accordance with traditional modes of delivering architectural projects to one with a clearer focus on the architects’ design responsibilities to clients and society;
is acknowledged as the basis for a proportionate, effective regulatory model which ensures that only competent architects are eligible to join and remain on the Architect Registers in order to provide assurance and confidence to the public about the expected professional standard of architects in Australia;
is flexible enough to reflect core competencies applied across varied competency profiles; and
reflects an explicit ethical focus – particularly around societal obligations of architects with respect to climate change and acknowledgement of the of integrating indigenous perspectives in the design process, and cultural diversity more broadly.
To support the broad consultation that has occurred, as well as the iterative process of review and refinement, the Project Timeframes continue to be reviewed and adjusted, with the current stage of work being extended to early November. This will result in the follow-on final consultation stage (Stage 5) commencing from mid November and extending into late January.
All important details, including updates on progress, can be found on the 2020 Review of the NSCA webpage here.
Help us understand the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the people of Australian architecture and the built environment.
This survey is a collaboration between Parlour, the Architects Champions of Change groups and the Architects Accreditation Council of Australia. We need your help to identify significant changes in work arrangements and circumstances, to explore which new aspects are valued, and to understand what people would like to take forward into the workplaces of the future. Please complete the survey and encourage those in your network to do the same.
With the evolving COVID-19 situation, AACA has analysed COVID-19 impacts on the accreditation of architecture programs. During March and April AACA has taken comments and advice from a number of sources including advisory committees and panels, and representatives from a number of Providers of tertiary architecture programs. In light of the current situation and the impact of COVID-19 disruptions to normal program delivery, in April the AACA referred recommended changes to the accreditation of architecture programs to the Architect Registration Boards. By the end of May AACA had received unanimous support to the adoption of the proposed changes from the seven Architect Registration Boards that are the accrediting bodies for the 20 accredited architecture programs in Australia.
The approved changes are adoption of a 12 month “pause” of key accreditation activities and the application of a 12 month extension to all accredited programs. The “pause” to accreditation activities incorporates a one year deferment of all Accreditation Review Panels for accredited programs (and an associated extension to the period of accreditation of each program by one year) and adjustments to Provider Annual Reporting in 2020. New programs scheduled for an Accreditation Review Panel are being considered on a case-by-case basis.
Outline the methodology and consultation framework for the project
Provide the initial position from the NSCA Review Expert Reference Group on the threshold matters to be considered
Provide the basis for stakeholders to respond to the views and recommendations proposed in the paper
Responses to the Issues Paper must be received by AACA by no later than Friday 31st July.
Stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback using the guidance described at Enclosure 5 of the Paper. Support in using the requested structure will assist the AACA and Expert Reference Group in analysing all feedback, identifying the relative merit of recommendations, and the drafting of revisions to the Standard. Respondents are encouraged to favour concise statements of support and/or alternative views and recommendations rather than general comment.
Feedback received in this consultation phase will inform the drafting of revisions to the NSCA. A final consultation stage is planned for feedback on the revised NSCA in October and November.
All important details, including updates on progress, can be found on the 2020 Review of the NSCA webpage here.
The platform for the 2020 National Examination Paper will change to an on-line remote proctored platform via candidates’ individual devices.
Given the continuing challenges posed by COVID 19 AACA determined, in consultation with the Architect Registration Boards, that the most practicable and fair way of implementing the NEP in 2020 is to move from the computer testing centre platform to online delivery via remote proctoring.
What is online remote proctoring?
Remote proctoring involves sitting the exam under live supervision using the computer’s webcam in a suitable location with internet connectivity. We will partner with, ProctorU*, who will provide the technical basis for each candidate to provide their own platform for the exam. ACER continues their services in professional advice on the exam and works with ProctorU to implement the exam.
*ProctorU is a US based company providing their services across the world.
Watch thisSHORT VIDEO for an understanding of how remote proctoring works.
How will online remote proctoring work for the August NEP?
There is no change to the role of the Architect Registration Boards in reviewing the logbooks and Statement of Practical Experience to determine eligibility for the exam.
There is no change to the content and format of the exam. Candidates will see the exam in the same format as they would if they were sitting the exam in an examination centre.
There will be no change to the way in which the exam results are issued to candidates.
What happens if candidates experience IT problems during the exam?
ProctorU and ACER have systems in place to deal with IT issues before and during the exam, and the system has the capacity to allow extra time for candidates to complete the exam depending on the problem.
What are the provisions in place to minimise the risk of cheating in the exam?
The exam will be conducted by remote proctoring under secure examination conditions pre-examination, during the exam and post exam through documentation review.
ProctorU’s ‘Live+’ option is the best option for high-stakes programs looking to maintain integrity and credibility. Candidates download an app that allows ProctorU to download the exam at the specific time and to allow keystroke monitoring and active live proctoring throughout the session via the candidate’s camera on their device. This system facilitates active intervention if any cheating behaviours are noted during the exam and also allows post examination intervention if necessary as all interviews are documented.
Before starting the exam, candidates will be connected to a live proctor who will take them through an extensive checking and security process including, but not limited to, ensuring a workspace that is free of prohibited materials, such as reference texts or mobile devices. The online live proctor and AI programs that support them will monitor candidate activity at all times throughout the test.
What happens next?
All candidates who are already enrolled in Session 1 of the NEP will be contacted by the Architect Registration Board where the application was made with detailed information on how the process will work.
Candidates who are successfully enrolled in Session 2 of the NEP which closes mid-June will receive detailed information on how the process will work with their letter of offer.
The AACA will provide updates in the Procedure for Candidates via the APE section of the AACA website and Architect Registration Board websites. PALs and PARC co-ordinators and other interested stakeholders will also be kept informed of the changed process.
In response to demand we have published the on-line Briefing Sessions on the EPA and the OQA conducted by experienced AACA program staff in May 2020. See here for the link to the Briefing Session on the EPA and here for the Session on the OQA.
If you want to find out more about Overseas Qualifications Assessment Stage 2 / Overseas Qualifications Assessment Stage 1 & Stage 2 Combined Assessment or Experienced Practitioner Assessment after reading the Guide for Applicants please contact us at [email protected].
If you want to attend the free interactive session on:
AACA, in consultation with the Architect Registration Boards, is monitoring the COVID-19 situation. We continue to follow the guidance of the Commonwealth and State Health Departments in relation to gatherings of people; and advice on the examination from our expert consultants.
As per the advice issued to successful candidates by Architect Registration Boards, candidates who were scheduled to sit the National Examination Paper on 21 April have been enrolled in the National Examination Paper to be held at Cliftons Venues on 18 August 2020. Exam details and/or alternative arrangements will be issued through your local Architect Registration Board closer to the date.
Candidates who intend applying for Session 2 of the 2020 APE, should submit their Logbook and Statement of Practical Experience to their local Architect Registration Board as per the published timetable on the AACA website. Successful Part 1 candidates will be enrolled in the National Examination Paper to be held at Cliftons Venues on 18 August 2020. Exam details and/or alternative arrangements will be issued through your local Architect Registration Board closer to the date.